Do not let the statistics fool you
According to recent statistics, the divorce rate in 2005 was 3.6 (per 1000 people) in the United States. This a decrease from 2000′s rate (4.2) and from 1990′s rate (4.7). Furthermore, the Associated Press notes the highest ever divorce rate at 5.3 in 1981. This is something to be happy about, not so? Don’t these statistics seem to indicate that more couples are staying together? Not necessarily, according to the marriage statistics posted at divorcemag.com.
You see, what the divorce statistics do not show you is, that while the rates are dropping, so are the number of marriages that take place each year. Divorcemag.com reports, that there were 2,230,000 marriages in 2005, a drop from 2004, where there were about 49,000 more marriages. Why, if there has been an increase in the American population, by approximately 2.9 milllion, has the number of marriages dropped?
The answer lies in the link between the two, the divorce rate and the marriage rate. Consider this, if less marriages take place, then over time the number of existing marriages declines, therefore leaving less couples with potential to become divorced. Hence, the declining divorce rate is not a result of more couples staying together and working out their problems. Most likely, it results from there being less marriages, and more “shack-ups”. After all, there cannot be a divorce if there was never a marriage in the first place.
More and more, we see and hear of couples deciding to move in together, and becoming apprehensive toward marriage. Even in Hollywood, many stars, such as Brad Pitt, the Ocean’s Eleven actor, have decided against marriage. He has refused to marry his three-year girlfriend, Tomb Raider actress, Angelina Jolie, despite their having six children. Life and Style quotes a source as saying, “Brad’s divorce from Jen (Jennifer Aniston) was painful. It was hard on on his parents and he considers it a major failure in his life. His big excuse for not marrying Angelina is that he hates even the possibility of something like that happening again.”
We have certainly come a long way, since just twenty or thirty years ago, a couple could not live together without being married. If it ever happened, it certainly did not go without ridicule and extreme negative response from the public.
USA Today reports, Rickie Lockhart, 56, of Sacramento was married at 18 and didn’t live with her ex-husband first. “You didn’t do things like that back then. You got married,” she says. “That’s what everybody expected.”
“The nature of cohabitation has changed,” says Jay Teachman in an USA Today article. He is a sociology professor at Western Washington University in Bellingham. “Cohabitators 20 years ago were the rule breakers, the rebels, the risk takers — the folks who were perhaps not as interested in marriage, and using cohabitation as an alternative to marriage.”
In a poll taken by USA Today, 49% said living together makes divorce less likely.
“If you’re living with someone, you actually get to know somebody more than you would not living with them,” says Christopher Sekulich, 37, of Melvindale, Michigan, reported USA Today.
While it may make sense that living with someone in order to get to know them allows for a split, without the hassle of divorce if it did not work out, consider this; cohabitation could make couples more likely to breakup, after all, unlike marriage, there is no real commitment, nothing to anchor the relationship. When conflict arises, what will stop one person from running out on the other instead of trying to work it out for the sake of the relationship? Hence the reason for marriage and marital vows in the first place, the vow to work it out no matter what.
One thing is for sure, less people are getting married, and less children belong to married parents. What does this mean for the future of America? Hopefully not greater depletion of family values and structure. Along with everything else going haywire in the world, we certainly do not need that. So we must decide quickly whether this is a good thing or a bad thing. We must weigh the pros and cons, because there is another thing we do not need. Nasty surprises.
Berlusconi Has Done It Again!!!
Silvio Berlusconi, Italian Prime Minister, seems to have gotten himself into a bit of a spot with the media, after referring to American President Elect Barack Obama as “tanned”. He reportedly passed it off as a joke and thoroughly blasted a reporter who seemed to be insinuating otherwise. The result? Many people believe Berlusconi’s comments were racist.
Do I agree with this conclusion? Not necessarily. It would certainly take more than a thoughtless joke in poor taste, to convince me that someone is racist. Maybe a little insensitive……okay, a lot. Especially when it came out of the mouth of a man, who many times in the past, has uttered statements that provide irrefutable proof that he is quite outspoken, and would do well to practice thinking before speaking.
After all, this is the man who made a vulgar gesture, “corna” behind the head of Josep Pique, a Spanish foreign minister, and dismissed it saying he was only joking around and trying to lighten the atmosphere. He compared Martin Shulz, a german SPD Member of the European Parliament, to Hitler saying, “Mr Schulz, I know a movie producer in Italy who is making a movie about Nazi concentration camps. I suggest you play the role of a Kapo. You are perfect for the part!” Also in 2005, he caused controversy at the opening of the European Food Safety Authority in Parma. He said that in order to convince Finnish president Tarja Halonen to locate EFSA in Parma instead of a Finnish location, he had to “dust off my playboy skills.” To make matters worse, a member of his cabinet released this statement, somehow believeing this would clear things up, “anyone who had seen a picture of Halonen must have been aware that he had been joking”. Too true!
Even worse, in 2006 he somehow found a way to defend his assertion that Communists used to eat children. Let’s see what he came up with. He explained that if you look in the Black Book of Communism, you will see that in communist China, they did not eat children, but they boiled them in order to fertilise their fields! HAHAHAHHAHA! Sorry, this man knows how to make me laugh! I mean it is silly! Then to back up exactly what I believe about Berlusconi, he said, “It was questionable irony … because this joke is questionable. But I did not know how to restrain myself.”
He did not know how to restrain himself. He still does not know, as he has proven so, time and time again and recently with his comment about Barack Obama..
Is he racist? I do not believe so. If he is indeed racist, then I’d have to say, he’s also sexist, (he did say that right-wing women were better looking than those in the left wing and therefore, the left had no taste in women and even criticized the Spanish Government because they have an equal number of men and women in their Council of Ministers) and basically…anti-non-italians. From what I’ve seen and read he’s made unsettling comments to and about everyone who existed and exists under the bright yellow sun.
If you’ve read my other pieces I’m sure you know that I am black, or rather West Indian, and if anybody should have been insulted by his comments, I should have been, definitely. But I was not. Actually, I read the article, and when I got to the “tanned” line, I laughed. I then thought, this is the big deal? This is what all the hoopla is about? Really? And I’m sure Barack Obama is probably wondering the same thing. It was obviously a joke, not necessarily a good one or well thought out one, and I will not even say it was taken out of context. There was no reason for it to be taken out of context, other than for some person who seems to like bacchanal and controversy, to use it do their own deceitful purposes.
I believe people in the media, though we all like juicy stories, must not try to squeeze too hard to get it. Or atleast if we want to get the juice out of the coconut, we should find out if there is any at all. Don’t be content to observe it from the outside, and surmise that since the coconut is yellow, there must be something inside. We must dissect it, dissect the story, and extract the truth.
“I will try to help relations between Russia and the United States where a new generation has come to power. I don’t see problems for Medvedev to establish good relations with Obama because he is young, handsome and even tanned, therefore I think that a good cooperation can be developed”
It’s obvious, no matter how bad it may have sounded when he said it, that he was comparing Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev. They are both young Presidents 44 and 43, respectively, they were both recently elected in their respective countries this year, they are both good-looking men. And I supposed in some warped way, if you squint your eyes really good, they’re both “tanned”, I guess. He was saying because of this they should get along very well and it should help to establish a good relationship between Russia and the United States. Other than the “tanned” part it would have been a somewhat good comment, I think and being someone who likes to go overboard, he had to add a punch line. Except this time, maybe there was too much punch.
I hate having to defend people who do not think before they speak, but that is the way of life of a politician. I refuse to be ignorant and believe everybody is out to get the blacks and that people never say things that end up being misconstrued. Even President Elect Barack Obama made his blunders, saying in a press conference, that he had spoken to all the living presidents. Then he added smiling, “I didn’t want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any seances.” A joke, I might add, that was in very poor taste and was quite correctly answered with resounding silence from his then audience. I understand, though, why he though it was a funny thing to say.
However, I will say this; Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi could definitely learn to put a lid on it. He was definitely wrong on this one. He demonstrated very poor judgement or rather a lack of judgment altogether. I would recommend that he try to mentally run his comments through some sort of sensitivity filter. Everyone has one, Mr. Berlusconi…..yes, even you. But I am sure you know this already, and so I will not be wasting my recommendations on you.
Categorized in Uncategorized
Tags: Berlusconi, medvedev obama, obama tanned, racist comments